At least 10 Florida journalists received regular payments from a U.S. government program aimed at undermining the Cuban government of Fidel Castro, The Miami Herald reported on Friday.
Pablo Alfonso, who reports on Cuba and wrote an opinion column for El Nuevo Herald, was paid almost $175,000 since 2001 to host shows on Radio and TV Marti, U.S. government programs that promote democracy in Cuba, according to government documents obtained by The Miami Herald.
Olga Connor, a freelance reporter who wrote about Cuban culture for El Nuevo Herald, received about $71,000 from the U.S. Office of Cuba Broadcasting, and staff reporter Wilfredo Cancio Isla, who covered the Cuban exile community and politics, was paid almost $15,000 in the last five years, the Herald said.
The newspaper said Alfonso and Cancio were fired and Connor's freelance relationship was severed.
Children's publishing company Scholastic said that it is removing materials from its Web site originally created for use in conjunction with ABC's "The Path to 9/11" amid growing controversy over the docudrama...."After a thorough review of the original guide that we offered online to about 25,000 high school teachers, we determined that the materials did not meet our high standards for dealing with controversial issues," Dick Robinson, Chairman, President and CEO of Scholastic said in a statement. They will be replaced with materials stressing critical thinking and media literacy.
Media Matters for America review of The Path to 9/11 "resource sheets" and "discussion guide[s]" provided to teachers has found that the material omits critical information regarding the Bush administration's pre-Iraq war weapons of mass destruction claims; falsely suggests a tie between Iraq and the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks; gives upbeat accounts of reportedly dire conditions on the ground in both Iraq and Afghanistan; suggests that military responses to Osama bin Laden by the Clinton administration could have "hinder[ed] the U.S. stance on the war on terror"; and asks students to debate whether the media "hinder our national security."
In spite of huge donations from Wal-Mart and Amway Jeb Bush's candidate for Florida Senate, Frank Bolanos, lost the Republican primary.
Strike at Eastern Michigan University . American Association of University Professors union chapter includes librarians.
For details see Union Librarian.
Richmond Times-Dispatch notes: Novelists Stephen King and John Grisham plan to appear at a Sept. 24 fundraiser for fellow writer Jim Webb's Democratic U.S. Senate campaign.
List of Books at Librarian2.
--ALA Councilor, Mark C. Rosenzweig, August 22, 2006 on viewing Spike Lee's documentary on New Orleans, When the Levees Broke, wrote to the ALA Council urging that the Association--
"rededicate ourselves to tell the truth about New Orleans, Katrina, and the government, to change, in any way we can, those conditions, those structures, those attitudes in this country which set-up, permiitted, sustained and still covers-up this destruction and misery."
Read the entire letter here: New Orleans, Spike Lee, Mark C. Rosenzweig, Services to Poor People, Librarians and the Bush Family.
The Indianapolis Star reports:
The Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library Board agreed this week to recognize an employee union if enough eligible workers vote for it....
In a resolution passed unanimously Thursday, the seven-member board established policies for organizing such a union, including a requirement that at least 75 percent of the employees cast ballots in an election.
The 2,996 Project.
The idea is simple, but powerful: have a special tribute for each victim of 9/11, with each tribute being created by a different blogger.
The Tampa Tribune reports:
Yoga, Pilates, opera, books and advocating for his beliefs are passions for Bart Birdsall, a first-time candidate seeking the District 2 Hillsborough School Board seat in south Tampa.
"I have a firm belief in what's right and what's wrong," said the 39-year-old media specialist at Greco Middle School in Temple Terrace....
Although this is his first political campaign, Birdsall drew media attention in 2005 for protesting the removal of a county library book display featuring gay authors and for displaying a sign proclaiming, "I'm a gay school librarian" at a gay pride rally.
After his initial protest, Birdsall was warned by a school district professional standards official not to post messages on a library message board using the district e-mail system. Believing his First Amendment rights had been violated during the whole protest experience, Birdsall read publicly from the books that had been removed from the libraries outside a meeting of county commissioners.
Bart Birdsall was honored as a 2006 Mover and Shaker by Library Journal in the article "Pride and Prejudice."
In "Class: A Personal Story" by Michael D. Yates in the July-August Monthly Review the author describes the moment of intellectual awakening as taking place when he found radical periodicals in the library.
The longlist for The Man Booker Prize 2006 will be announced on Monday 14 August 2006.
Details of the judging panel of the Man Booker Prize for Fiction 2006 have been announced. Chaired by Hermione Lee, the line-up consists of poet and novelist Simon Armitage, award-winning novelist, Candia McWilliam; critic Anthony Quinn and actress Fiona Shaw.
The Red Mantis list has an interesting set of books and you can then go back and read others who have been tagged which is sort of a busman's holiday for a readers' advisor.
MONTREAL. For CUPE 391's Peter DeGroot, Doug Klohn and Tara Robertson, the Workers Out! conference was an empowering experience they'll remember for years to come as they continue working to make a difference for lesbian, gay, bi and trans (LGBT) CUPE members.
CUPE was a major partner of the Workers Out! conference. Over three days last week, the Vancouver Public Library trio and other CUPE members from across Canada were among the 350 participants from labour organizations all over the world who participated in workshops, plenary sessions and round-table discussions. They were working on an international strategic plan to help unions take up the struggle for LGBT rights in the workplace and in society...
DeGroot, Klohn and Robertson produced a blog about the event. After four days, the site was loaded with colourful photos and a wealth of information reflecting the diversity of delegates, the range of issues and the meaningful connections made....
At the closing of the conference, The Declaration of Montreal was shared with all of the delegates. This declaration challenges the United Nations to advance the human rights of ALL people around the world. That our conference focused on LGBT issues, it follows that The Declaration of Montreal does have an emphasis on the rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered people, but it clearly shows that we are not basing our movement on this narrow perspective. Until full Human Rights are achieved for all, the organizing will continue.
A study conducted by Shirley Rhodes examines the absence of safe environments for satisfying the educational and recreational needs of the target population, which occurred as a result of a Hillsborough County Board of Commissioners (HCBOC) creation of a discrimination policy issue that banned book displays, gay pride events in public areas, and reportedly has become a political platform to remove the rights of gay foster parents and other related equal rights concerns. Documented responses from the opposing library and educators in the community, and other advocates that dispute the ban/censorship on the displayed award-winning books with GLBTQ themes, continue as selected books in libraries, media centers, and schools are challenged. These issues are explored, including the counter-responses from the supportive advocates.
Library Juice reports:
The Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication passed a resolution against the Bush Administration's anti-press policies at its annual conference.
the current administration has engaged in a number of practices and has enacted a series of severe and extraordinary policies that attack the press specifically and by extension, democracy itself.
The Constitution in Crisis; The Downing Street Minutes and Deception,Manipulation, Torture, Retribution, and Coverups in the Iraq War,and Illegal Domestic Surveillance.
Rep. John Conyers
Final "Constitution in Crisis" Report
Six Years of Unchecked Abuses -- Had Enough?
Today, I am releasing the final version of my report, the "Constitution in Crisis." The report, which is some 350 pages in length and is supported by more than 1,400 footnotes, compiles the accumulated evidence that the Bush Administration has thumbed its nose at our nation's laws, and the Constitution itself.... Approximately 26 laws and regulations may have been violated by this Administration's misconduct.
Our Constitution established a tri-partite system of government, with the notion that each branch of government would act as a check on the other two. Unfortunately, for the last six years, the Republicans in Congress have largely viewed themselves as defenders of the Bush Administration, instead of a vital check on overreaching by the Executive Branch. By doing so, I believe they have acted to the detriment of our Constitutional form of government.The Constitution in Crisis; The Downing Street Minutes and Deception,Manipulation, Torture, Retribution, and Coverups in the Iraq War,and Illegal Domestic Surveillance.
The Committee on House Administration held an oversight hearing on the Library of Congress on Thursday, July 27, 2006. A webcast is available on the Committee website at http://cha.house.gov
Statement of Saul Schniderman
The Library of Congress Professional Guild
AFSCME Local 2910
before the Committee on House Administration
World Digital Library
July 27, 2006
Chairman Ehlers and Ranking Minority Member Millender-McDonald,
My name is Saul Schniderman and I am the president of the Library of Congress Professional Guild, AFSCME Local 2910 representing over 1600 professional employees working at the Library of Congress. These employees are dedicated to providing the best possible service to Congress and to the American people.
On November 22, 2005, James H. Billington, the Librarian of Congress, proposed to create a "World Digital Library" for the purpose of bringing people together "by celebrating the depth and uniqueness of different cultures in a single global undertaking." On the same day Sergey Brin, the multi-billionaire cofounder of Google, Inc., announced that Google was contributing three million dollars to the project. "Google supports the World Digital Library," he said, "because we share a common mission of making the world's information universally accessible and useful."
In fact, the Library's mission is not the same as Google's mission. Mr.Brin says that Google's mission is to "organize all of the worldÂ’'s information and make it universally accessible and useful." Google has taken on a monumental task for one corporation, especially considering the copyright restrictions inherent in such a project. The Library of CongressÂ’ mission, on the other hand, seems to be more realistic and focused: "to makes its resources available and useful to the Congress and the American people and to sustain and preserve a universal collection of knowledge and creativity for future generations." The LibraryÂ’'s mission is based on public service and reflects traditional democratic values of privacy rights, intellectual freedom, and open access.
In the past year, Library staff members have been hearing all sorts of pronouncements from top management that drastic changes are afoot and that the Library is in the process of making a "transition" to digital formats.
"Providing access" to our collections, we are told, means digitizing them so that they are not "confined" within our Capitol Hill walls. The World Digital Library project has been announced and the Library will increasingly digitize its special collections for worldwide access on the open Internet. ItÂ’'s all part of a new vision for the Library of Congress.
But itÂ’s also a fact that the Library cannot digitize the vast bulk of itÂ’s holdings while the U.S. copyright law remains in effect. Any digital project is faced with this obstacle: you can'Â’t reproduce content on the Internet without first seeking permission from its author. The popular LC American Memory digitization project is boxed in by this copyright
restriction and so its digital materials are either in the public domain or are made available with special permission.
We would therefore caution Congress not to regard the digitization of collections as the Library's central mission or core function. For example, our highly regarded American Memory project has digitized about 10 million items; but the way "items" are being counted needs qualification.
Sometimes a scanned item is a photograph, a map, or a manuscript page. On the print side, the Library receives 1,200 new books every working day. The Library'Â’s vast collection of 20 million copyright-protected books cannot be digitized for free distribution on the Internet; it remains freely available only to onsite researchers and to other library users throughout the country via inter-library loan.
The point is this: while digitization projects are useful and prestigious, they provide access to only a microscopic portion of the Library'Â’s collections, and for that reason should not be regarded as core functions that are more important than existing operations, such as our cataloging
and classification work. In itÂ’s rush to "transition" to the digital age, the Library should not lose sight of its core mission nor abandon its traditional base.
Our union was established at the Library in 1976 and we represent both catalogers (print) and conversion specialists (digital). Many of us have spent our entire careers at the Library and have witnessed significant changes over the years. But when the Library hires consultants for a "Digital Competencies Development Project," and a "Workforce Transformation Initiative," we wonder out loud: what are they really talking about? Where are they leading us? And why?
Part of Library managementÂ’s vision of a "digital library" is an
assumption that collections that are digitized and "freed" from their physical locations on Capitol Hill can be made accessible to the world through the Google search box. This gets a bit complicated so I urge the Committee to visit our website at www.guild2910.org for a more in-depth
discussion of whether GoogleÂ’'s keyword searching will eliminate the need for LC cataloging and classification.
The problem with the Google keyword search box is this: it is limited in that it displays the search results in "relevance ranked" order yet cannot adequately separate the wheat from the chaff. Google may be great for the quick information seeker, great for business, great for online consumers,great for the undergraduate student sitting in his or her dorm room cramming for a term paper due tomorrow. But itÂ’ is not great for the serious researcher who wants an overview of sources relevant to a particular topic. It is not great for the scholar who needs to do extensive and in-depth research.
Typing key words into a Google search box provides access to digitized information through "relevance ranking." When you search on Google your "hits" are "ranked" through an automatic computer algorithm, determined primarily by counting the number of other Internet sites that link to the
sites retrieved by the keywords you typed into the box. When I type the words "capital punishment" in the Google box I get over 10 million "hits" ranked according to relevance. Even if I refine my search under Google'Â’s
Advanced Search technique, I still retrieve all sorts of digital materials of no interest to me. In short, I can'Â’t discern the wheat from the chaff and, after a while, I give up on Google and try something else.
This is why scholars utilize the Library of Congress online catalog or come to the Library to conduct research. Catalogers at the Library create standardized category terms that "round up" all works on the same subject Â– no matter which keywords their authors have used, and no matter which languages the authors have written in. Because Library catalogers utilize conceptual categories known as "subject headings" researchers are able to systematically retrieve all of the works relevant to their topic, not just
those that have the exact words the searcher could think of. Google searching, essentially, is confined to retrieving only the words that get typed in.
For example: if you searched the subject "capital punishment" in a Library of Congress catalog, the catalog would round up such titles as "The Ultimate Coercive Sanction," "To Kill and Be Killed," "Habeas Corpus
Issues," "Fatal Error," "A Life for a Life," and many others in both English and a variety of other languages. This is because trained LC catalogers have applied a conceptual cataloging and classification scheme,not a computer algorithm that just looks at keystrokes. It is no wonder
that thousands of libraries throughout the nation, large and small, depend upon LC bibliographic records for their quality and accuracy, as the best alternative to Google searching. And it is no wonder that, quite recently, the Executive Board of the American Library Association praised LC cataloging but also raised serious questions about management's
apparent willingness to radically change, or even give up entirely, the practice of supplying LC subject headings .
Because of its design, Google searching gives you a super speedy retrieval of "hits." Unfortunately, the search results are often incomplete, haphazard, indiscriminate and largely confined to English language sources. AFSCME member Thomas Mann, a veteran reference librarian in the Main Reading Room and the author of The Oxford Guide to Library Research wonders if the national library of the United States is "giving away the birthright of American scholars in exchange for a mess of Internet pottage." His paper can be viewed on our Web page.
The Library of Congress is the nationÂ’'s oldest cultural institution. It is loved by the American people, by the Congress, and by the staff who work here. The World Digital Library may be very prestigious, but despite the grandeur of its name, only a very small percentage of our collection
can be made available over the Internet because of copyright
restrictions. Such projects should not be allowed to displace core library functions.
If we go forward with Google, Inc., letÂ’s respect each other'Â’s
competencies and unique roles in society. But let us always maintain support for the Library of Congress and its mission.
The Library of Congress Professional Guild
AFSCME Local 2910
mail stop 9994
phone: (202) 707-6493 or (202) 707-1304
fax: (202) 707-1873
Room no. LM G-41
Library of Congress
Washington, DC 20540-9994
"Opinions expressed are those of the authors, and are not official
statements by the Library of Congress."