Do Book Ratings Belong in Library Catalogs?

Do Book Ratings Belong in Library Catalogs?
"To me it feels like a violation of public library philosophy. I have less of a problem when the rating is average or high because I assume it encourages patrons to check out a book they are already considering. But when patrons see a low rating on a book in our catalog, especially a rating not attributed to an individual patron, it appears that our library is bad-mouthing the book…and that discourages, rather than promotes, literacy."

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Book Ratings

I can understand the concern but I admit I'd like to see the ratings.
Positive ones would probably influence some to select titles/authors hitherto unknown to them. Negative ones, well I'm contrary minded enough that I might sign the thing out to see for myself, OR I'd explore why it was given a negative rating. ie. mismatch for audience? content v style? etc. It could certainly inform collection development.

Of course I would prefer all ratings to be attributable. Real name or nom de plume wouldn't matter as long as there were a means to connect. If we wish to comment then we should stand behind what we say & allow others to engage us too.

Oh really?

"If we wish to comment then we should stand behind what we say & allow others to engage us too." - Anonymous

So this sentiment doesn't extend to LISNews? I actually agree with everything you said in your comment, but I couldn't resist picking on you a little bit over this.;)

Syndicate content