To be clear, I’m not talking about the ebook themselves; they are a perfectly fine media format. But the continuous need of comparison of the two formats (electronic versus physical) is just plain stupid. Perhaps, as both an emerging market and medium, people feel the need to make this examination constantly. However, it’s often a misrepresentation: it’s the capabilities of the ereader device being compared to the physical book, not the ebook itself. Ebooks, like physical books, do not have a great range of functionality or features in and of themselves. It’s the hype, the fear, the uncertainty of how the ebooks will change libraries that is just leading some pretty smart people to make some pretty dumb statements. Where is this notion of a threat to libraries coming from?
-- Read More
Recent comments
1 day 3 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 16 hours ago
1 day 23 hours ago
2 days 4 hours ago
2 days 9 hours ago
2 days 10 hours ago
2 days 11 hours ago
2 days 11 hours ago
2 days 10 hours ago