Get LISNews via email! Enter Your Email Address:
Daniel Phelan and Sarahbellum noted a Story On a Librarian how had sued over SARS duty Hospital staffer was pressed into service screening visitors Claiming she lost her job after refusing to continue risky task.
Kellee Kaulback, who worked in the hospital's library for two years, said she was made to work as a SARS screener during the outbreak but received no training in how to fit her mask or properly take temperatures.
And you thought shelf reading was bad!
The NYTimes Reports Carol Krohn, a secretary at the Floral Park Public Library, was accused in court yesterday of stealing more than $77,000 in library funds from the rental and sale of videos.
Sergeant Guido said Ms. Krohn had stolen the money from January 1995 to May 2003, the length of her employment with the library.
-Heather. spotted This One from over at Monster.com on a geek turned librarian.
A former work colleague who had earned her master's in library science encouraged Abrams to marry his love of books and technology. "Things that looked interesting to me -- jobs in information architecture -- suggested an MLS degree," he says.
Michael McGrorty has Library Unions: a Matrix for Evaluation on the California Library Association site.
He says evaluating library unionism has always forced the viewer to abandon certain conventions at the start of the undertaking. The library is a different animal than the typical run of union shop, even in the public sector, and even against the background of somewhat analogous operations like the public school.
News From Savannah, MO, where Nearly a dozen people gathered quietly Sunday afternoon to protest the dismissal of two employees of the Rolling Hills Consolidated Library in Savannah.
They refuse to work on Sundays because of their religious convictions.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Reports A federal appeals court has confirmed that officials with the library system for Atlanta and Fulton County made a $17 million mistake by discriminating against seven white librarians.
An opinion filed Friday in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's ruling against the library. The opinion, based on a unanimous decision by a three-judge panel, said officials knew it was illegal to consider race in personnel decisions, yet they transferred the women to lesser jobs anyway because of the color of their skin.
The Sydney Morning Herald has This Article on information overload. Experts say information overload is a serious problem in many companies, adding to stress levels and resulting in a downturn in productivity (a report from Proudfoot Consulting last year found IT-related problems - such as information overload - were responsible for 8 per cent of lost time).
They outline seven skills all knowledge workers need to help counter the problem of information overload
One Out Of Edinburgh says plans to open libraries across Edinburgh every Saturday and Sunday afternoon for the first time could be scuppered by staff reluctant to give up their weekends.
The city council, which has pledged to spend around £250,000 annually making it a permanent move, is being warned some librarians would rather quit than work extra hours.
Michael McGrorty writes "Yesterday I was sitting at the reference desk, enjoying a brief moment of silence between patrons when it the entire meaning of the library business was revealed to me. At precisely eleven-thirty on a spring morning the oyster came open and I realized my place. And it was all because of a fellow named Donald.
Donald arrived at the tail end of the morning, dressed in a flannel shirt buttoned to the neck and corduroy pants without a belt. His face wore a deep frown, the sort which originates in a bad dream that continues into daylight, and the tumult of his hair showed that he had left home without consulting a mirror. He approached the desk like a man delivering a summons.
"I want to sue an attorney," he rasped, in a voice that sounded like he'd been shouting at somebody pretty recently. -- Read More
Rochelle Hartman writes "The Department of Labor is proposing changes to the creaky Fair Labor Standards Act, passed in 1938. The plan would make 1.3 million additional low-wage workers eligible for extra pay for any work beyond 40 hours. Current, higher-paid recipients would be removed from eligibility.
'Organized labor supports some change, particularly allowing more low-paid workers to be eligible for overtime. But they fear the net effect could be that more workers would lose overtime pay because of job-classification changes,' reports Cindy Skrzycki in the Washington Post. The story here. Once the proposal is formally introduced, there will be a 90-day comment period, available, I assume on the Department of Labor website
I've been working on a story about this with a library law attorney, wanting to investigate what the FLSA means to non-management, public "professional" librarians. What I've learned so far is that the Department of Labor does not consider MLS librarians professionals because they are not treated as such by their managers, their municipalities, and the public. Shouldn't have been news to me, but it did make me cranky. Currently, MLSs' "non-professional" status makes them largely and legally non-exempt (eligible), but not sure how the new proposal will affect this.