Time for OverDrive to sell itself to America’s public libraries?

OverDrive—the leading supplier of popular e-books for America’s public libraries—should sell itself to its library customers or at least think about it if they are willing and able to buy.

In Rockford, Illinois, a much-needed controversy rages about the local library system’s spending almost a quarter of this year’s $1.2 million acquisitions budget on e-content from OverDrive. Will the nonelite suffer in a recession-battered city of 153,000 with high rates of poverty and joblessness? How many low-income people own e-readers, and can 50 or 100 loaner Kindles really do the trick?

But what about a related question—whether a private company should lord it over our nation’s e-libraries in the first place? Why not sell OverDrive to our public libraries, then, if they can find the financing? O maybe to a nonprofit run on their behalf, with librarians and educators setting the direction and with capable, truly involved business people advising them? Such a transaction would allow OverDrive founder and CEO Steve Potash to leave a memorable legacy to the American people while still reaping financial rewards. In one leap we could be truly on our way toward a well-stocked national digital library system for all Americans.

Full piece at Teleread


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Does this mean that other jobbers should sell themselves, too? Ingram, B&T?


>Does this mean that other jobbers should sell themselves, too? Ingram, B&T?

Think for a moment. How is Overdrive different from the other vendors you mentioned?

But if we remove the nuance I think it might be a valid idea for libraries to own as much of the book/information supply chain as they can.

Syndicate content